<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Armies using Army Builders!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/</link>
	<description>Warmachine, Hordes, Warhammer, Flames of War, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/?p=723#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff, It&#039;s a pity Lone Wolf went all GW on you. They may have the trademark, but that&#039;s not the same as holding copyright. I think it&#039;d be hard to enforce ownership on such generic terms as Army and Builder. Anyway, I&#039;ve made those edits. Great work on the Warmachine &amp; Hordes army builder.

Owen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff, It&#8217;s a pity Lone Wolf went all GW on you. They may have the trademark, but that&#8217;s not the same as holding copyright. I think it&#8217;d be hard to enforce ownership on such generic terms as Army and Builder. Anyway, I&#8217;ve made those edits. Great work on the Warmachine &amp; Hordes army builder.</p>
<p>Owen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MontanaJeff</title>
		<link>http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>MontanaJeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/?p=723#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Hey Owen, 

Great review and thanks for reviewing my List Builder:

http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html

I was contacted by Lone Wolf Development and asked to not use the term &quot;Army Builder&quot; as they own the Trademark for it. Can you change the name of my app in this post to:

Warmachine &amp; Hordes Builder and change the URL to:

http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html

It&#039;s still the same app, a little too much scrolling at times I know...those darn buttons are just too big!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Owen, </p>
<p>Great review and thanks for reviewing my List Builder:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html</a></p>
<p>I was contacted by Lone Wolf Development and asked to not use the term &#8220;Army Builder&#8221; as they own the Trademark for it. Can you change the name of my app in this post to:</p>
<p>Warmachine &amp; Hordes Builder and change the URL to:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineeringcalculator.net/ListBuilder.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s still the same app, a little too much scrolling at times I know&#8230;those darn buttons are just too big!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/?p=723#comment-231</guid>
		<description>This is excellent news and would be a great step towards full syncing. iBodger&#039;s flexibility coupled with Forward Kommander&#039;s ease of use could be a real winner. Best of luck with it.

Owen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent news and would be a great step towards full syncing. iBodger&#8217;s flexibility coupled with Forward Kommander&#8217;s ease of use could be a real winner. Best of luck with it.</p>
<p>Owen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kilvati</title>
		<link>http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/2009/11/08/building-armies-using-army-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>kilvati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farfaraway.org/blog/?p=723#comment-230</guid>
		<description>As the guy behind forward kommander I can tell you a little secret. I was contacted last week by the iBodger guys about integration. First thing we are thinking about now is having a &quot;Export to Forward Kommander&quot; option in iBodger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the guy behind forward kommander I can tell you a little secret. I was contacted last week by the iBodger guys about integration. First thing we are thinking about now is having a &#8220;Export to Forward Kommander&#8221; option in iBodger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

